AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Ungoogled chromium ppa12/19/2023 The creators of web sites have responded by notĬaring about Firefox having to retry broken web sites in Chrome is a Its market share has been falling for years,Īnd not everybody is pleased with the directions that the Mozillaįoundation has taken. The larger problem, though, is that it's not at all clear that Firefox will Too, could be withdrawn at any time, but Firefox at least allows the use ofĪlternative servers, so concerned users need not be dependent on theĬontinued existence and good will of Mozilla. Meanwhile, smug Firefox users are able to use Firefox Sync with no ![]() That they no longer wish to make available. Just another example of an owner indulging a whim and taking away features Whim of its owner and has no such guarantee. To not disappear at inopportune times proprietary software works at the Want to remain in control of our systems. Many of us run free software - and avoid proprietary software - because we Remote server somewhere does not really change that situation. Software, but getting its full functionality requires accepting layers of Taken a path similar to Android's there is a core built with free ![]() With features like synchronization, that objective has not been met. Highlighting a situation that has existed for years already: you might useĬhromium as a way of avoiding proprietary software, but if you use Chromium The unhappiness emanating from Chromium users who are about to loseįeatures is understandable. Likely to be few volunteers to find out how Google would respond to such a But it's even more uncertain in a legal sense there are It is an uncertain path, in that GoogleĬould invalidate the keys - though that would involve force-upgrading a lot Would be terrible if everyone used them instead." Taking thatĪpproach has been discussed on some distribution lists, but it seems Have been known since 2013 (they're embedded in every Chrome binary). Hinted at: " The official Chrome API keys which will permit this usage There is, of course, an alternative to dropping Chromium that Callaway Want to continue if this change causes users to switch to something His intent to drop the package if Chromium cannot be made to work with Whether shipping Chromium still makes sense. There is any value in a crippled version of Chromium remaining in Thread in which he said: " I am seriously reconsidering whether Anticipating this, distributors areĪlready wondering whether packaging Chromium (evidently not the easiest of Less capable than they were the day before this will reduce the value ofĬhromium to many of its users. In other words, as of March 15, Chromium-based browsers will become rather ![]() There are quite a few others that, it seems, will be restricted as well.Īfter that date, users wanting to use those features will have to run The loss of the bookmark-synchronizationĪPI, in particular, has drawn a fair amount of attention, but On January 15, the Chromium blogīrief notice that, as of March 15, non-Chrome builds of Chromium These features are not part ofĬhromium, but Google has long provided API keysįor distributors of Chromium builds to use, ensuring that Chromium users These include bookmark synchronization, the safe-browsing feature, search Much of what appears to be Chrome (or Chromium)įunctionality is, in truth, provided by servers in Google's data centers. Number of "only works on Chrome" web sites without having to run Version of the Chromium browser it's a way to deal with the increasing Current estimates suggest that 60-70% of web usersĬhromium users do exist, though, and many Linux distributions package a In practice, Chromium usersĪre a tiny fraction of the browser-using population, while Chrome becomes Minus perhaps some proprietary DRM modules. Which is an open-source project in theory,Īnybody can build Chromium and get a browser of nearly equal capability, Proprietary browser, bundled with AndroidĪnd widely installed on other systems as well. ![]() In the 2020s, the browser wars continue with the growingĭominance of Chrome and, it would seem, the imminent removal of Chromium That effort was thwarted by antitrust efforts and the rise of theĮver since, the web has been defined by free software. The term "browser wars" typically refers to Microsoft's attempts toĭominate the World Wide Web with its Internet Explorer browser in theġ990s.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |